The innovator of the condition that necessitates the impossible as the seventh condition for the validity of a stipulation is Shaykh Ansari. He introduced this concept with regard to the example of the condition for reselling the sold item back to the seller, which according to Allamah, entails circular reasoning. In this discussion, one of the three meanings of stipulation is considered: the condition in the infinitive sense (the act of commitment itself), the passive sense (the subject of commitment), or the usuli condition, where in each of these meanings, stipulation can be seen as either a condition for an act or a condition for a result. To clarify the intended meaning of stipulation in the context of not necessitating the impossible, each of the three meanings was examined in terms of a condition for an act and a condition for a result. It became evident that in some cases, the stipulation is neither possible nor conceivable, while in others, the stipulation is a form of other valid conditions and does not involve necessitating the impossible. Additionally, a detailed analysis of Allamah’s statement showed that the stipulation in that context is a usuli condition and the type of condition of action. Testimonies from prominent contemporary jurists, including Mohaqiq Isfahani, Imam Khomeini, and Mohaqiq Khoei, who explicitly confirm this point, are presented in this work. Moreover, through a precise and in-depth analysis by Imam Khomeini regarding the usuli condition that implies the impossible and is of the type of condition of action, it became evident that this condition, like the condition of feasibility (the first condition) and the condition of rational purpose (the third condition), pertains to the realization of the essence of the condition and is fundamentally not a condition for validity.