Natural or legal persons enter into contracts based on their needs and objectives, necessitating the continuity of these agreements. This requirement persists across various legal circumstances without being exclusive to any specific situation; hence, in contemporary legal systems, enforcing a contract takes precedence over its instability. However, this imperative does not materialize in the case of invalidity, unlike other situations-such as lack of effectiveness and validity-which can be actualized without significant issues. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach and relying on credible library sources, this research seeks to find ways to actualize this imperative in the context of invalidity; therefore, it addresses the question of whether there is fundamentally a way to overcome the aforementioned challenge. One of the mechanisms proposed by experts in this situation is the rectification of void contracts. The mechanism of contract rectification operates in such a way that by preserving the nature of the contract, through the removal of the causes of invalidity, altering these causes, and adding new elements to the contract content, it facilitates the transformation of a void contract into a valid one. The findings indicate that the mechanism of rectifying a void contract can play a significant role in contract law, considering the inflexible perspective of jurisprudence and Iranian law towards invalidity and the equal importance and objectives of all rules related to invalidity. In this regard, by distinguishing between fundamental and non-fundamental conditions, the possibility of rectifying a contract in non-fundamental situations can be facilitated.

Keywords: Continuity Of Contracts, Invalidity, Correction of Void Contracts, Essential Contract Conditions, Non-Essential Contract Conditions, Elimination of Causes of Invalidity.